Tool · Pricing simulator
iPaaS renewal cost simulator
Your inputs stay in this browser.
This pricing simulator estimates what renewing your integration platform will cost year by year and over the term, how long a migration might take, and the year in which moving would break even. Start from your own contract; where you have no number, the defaults below come from sourced, dated reports. All results are estimates, not quotes.
Last updated . Figures are re-checked quarterly.
Your estimate
Enter target cost and team cost to see break-even.
Results appear here as you type. If nothing appears, JavaScript is off; the method and the assumptions below let you calculate the same figures by hand.
How the simulator calculates
- Renewal cost by year. Year 1 is your current annual contract value. Each later year multiplies the previous year by (1 + uplift). For example, $68,695 at 7% gives $68,695, $73,504 and $78,649.
- Term total. The sum of the yearly costs across your term.
- Migration effort. Number of integrations × months per integration, at a low, typical and high pace, with a one-month minimum. For an SAP PI/PO source, the pace defaults to SAP's published indicative durations for mostly lift-and-shift moves to Integration Suite. For every other platform there is no published benchmark, so you enter the pace; the effort range and break-even stay hidden until you do. Moving between platforms usually means rebuilding mappings and flows, so effort depends on how complex each integration is, not just how many you have.
- Break-even year. Moving costs the typical migration effort × your team's monthly cost once, plus the target platform's annual cost every year. Staying costs your renewing contract. The break-even year is the first year in which cumulative moving cost is no higher than cumulative staying cost, checked up to ten years.
- Cost per unit. If you enter licensed vCores, connections, connectors or endpoints, the simulator divides your annual cost by them, and by environments, so you can compare with reported per-unit prices.
Assumptions and sources
| Assumption | Default | Source |
|---|---|---|
| MuleSoft starting contract value | $68,695 | Vendr-reported median annual spend (Vendr: MuleSoft, checked on 2026-10-03) |
| Workato starting contract value | $64,544 | Vendr-reported median annual spend (Vendr: Workato, checked on 2026-10-03) |
| Boomi starting contract value | $45,147 | Vendr-reported median annual spend (Vendr: Boomi, checked on 2026-10-03) |
| Celigo starting contract value | $14,787 | Vendr-reported contract value (Vendr: Celigo, checked on 2026-10-03) |
| MuleSoft annual uplift | 7% | reported default renewal uplift (7%; 12% also seen) (Redress Compliance: Salesforce co-term calendar, checked on 2026-10-03) |
| Workato annual uplift | 13.3% | reported year-over-year increase, enterprise (24.05% for SMB) (SpendHound: Workato pricing, checked on 2026-10-03) |
| Boomi annual uplift | 6% | midpoint of the reported 5–7% renewal increase (checkthat.ai: Boomi pricing, checked on 2026-10-03) |
| Celigo annual uplift | 5% | midpoint of the reported 3–7% escalation range (Vendr: Celigo, checked on 2026-10-03) |
| Informatica, TIBCO, webMethods, BizTalk, other | No default | No source we could verify gives a typical contract value or annual uplift; enter your own. For TIBCO, VendorBenchmark reports renewal quotes 15–30% above the prior term (VendorBenchmark: TIBCO pricing, checked on 2026-10-03). |
| Term | 3 years | MuleSoft contracts are “typically structured as 3-year terms” (unmule.com: MuleSoft pricing 2026, checked on 2026-10-03) |
| Environments | 3 (1 production + 2 non-production) | development, test and production each need allocation (Integrate.io: Boomi pricing, checked on 2026-10-03) |
| Number of integrations | 100 | SAP’s “small landscape” size of up to 100 interfaces (SAP: FAQ, migration from Process Orchestration to Integration Suite, checked on 2026-10-03) |
| Migration pace, SAP PI/PO source only (months per integration) | 0.01 low / 0.02 typical / 0.03 high | derived from SAP’s indicative durations (100 interfaces in 1–3 months; 300 in 3–6 months) (SAP: FAQ, migration from Process Orchestration to Integration Suite, checked on 2026-10-03). |
| Migration pace, every other platform | No default (user-entered) | No published benchmark for migrating off MuleSoft, Workato, Boomi, Celigo, Informatica, TIBCO, webMethods or BizTalk; enter your own estimate. |
| Target platform annual cost | No default | Enter a quote or estimate for the platform you would move to. |
| Migration team cost per month | No default | Enter your blended internal or partner cost. |
Reported figures come from buyer-data and advisory sources, not from the vendors' price lists, except where a vendor publishes a price. See the iPaaS pricing comparison for context on each platform.
Reading the result
A break-even year inside your term means moving pays for itself before the next renewal decision; a break-even beyond the term means the case rests on other reasons, such as a support deadline or a capability gap. If the migration range is wide, the next step is a readiness check, which narrows it by looking at how complex your integrations really are.